Chhello Show (Last Film Show) review

October 15, 2022 by Keyur Seta Leave a Comment

Although filmmaker Pan Nalin’s Gujarati movie Chhello Show (English title: Last Film Show) released in India this week, it has been making a lot of noise internationally for the last two years. It is also India’s official entry for the Best Foreign Language film at the prestigious Oscars.

Whether it is a worthy choice for the Oscars is debatable. But, after going through the experience, it is a no brainer that the film deserves applause for its ode to the medium of cinema.

Chhello Show tells an interesting tale of a boy named Samay (Bhavin Rabari), who stays with his father (Dipen Raval), a tea-seller, mother (Richa Meena) and little sister in a remote village in Saurashtra. His father abhors movies but he once takes the entire family to watch a film at a nearby town simply because the movie in question is a devotional one. The father says that this is Samay’s first and the last film at a cinema hall [hence, the title].

But the little boy is mesmerized by the medium of cinema. He decides that this can never be his last show. So he steals money from his father, bunks school and secretly visits the theatre in that town, called Galaxy, to catch a film. His father gets to know of his ‘crime’ and he beats him up.

However, Samay strikes a friendship with the projectionist Fazal (Bhavesh Shrimali), who allows him watch films for free as long as he lets him eat his delicious lunch prepared by his mother. While Samay is loving being in company of cinema, his road ahead with the medium is full of thorns.

Pan Nalin’s writing and presentation makes you a keen observer of Samay’s life and his world instantly. If you happen to be a movie lover, you will deeply root for the boy to keep his affair with cinema continuing, despite the odds. But what works most for the film is the establishment of the protagonist’s innocence.

This ensures that you will support the kid even when he carries out immoral activities because they aren’t born out of any greed for money; it’s only for his love and fascination for cinema. The film has various moments that make you smile and at the same time feel emotional as you can sense that the overall film itself is a result of someone’s fascination for the art.

The technical aspects, in term of the natural camerawork and minimal background score, play a quiet yet important role in creating the overall effect.

Bhavin Rabari is nothing short of a main ‘hero’ who carries Chhello Show on his shoulders. Despite his age, he lives and breathes a character that doesn’t cease to adore you. Rahul Koli, as the protagonist’s friend, is equally good. It is super tragic that he passed away just before the release of the film.

Bhavesh Shrimali easily brings out the endearing nature of Fazal. Dipen Raval and Richa Meena are perfect as Samay’s parents. Thankfully, the former isn’t limited to being a strict father.

Although Chhello Show is semi-autobiographical account of the filmmaker himself, an important moment during the ending part is difficult to digest considering the age of the protagonist. The film also deserved to be crisper on a few occasions.

Also read: When SRK did a Panchayat 33 years ago

Also, it is impossible to not think about the classic Cinema Paradiso (1988) while watching Chhello Show. Once again, despite it being the real story of Pan Nalin, the basic idea and the main characters are similar to the 1988 movie. A line acknowledging the inspiration could have been added.

Having said that, Chhello Show has plenty going for itself that’s enough to move the movie lover in you.

Rating: 4 out of 5

Director: Pan Nalin

Producers: Pan Nalin, Dheer Momaya, Siddharth Roy Kapur and Marc Duale

Writer: Pan Nalin

Cast: Bhavin Rabari, Bhavesh Shrimali, Dipen Raval, Richa Meena

Aye Zindagi review – An incredible real story narrated convincingly

October 13, 2022 by Keyur Seta 1 Comment

Director Anirban Bose’s Aye Zindagi initially appears like just another story about a person struggling against a terminal illness.

The film begins in 2004 when the 26-year-old Vinayak (Satyajeet Dubey) is being diagnosed with severe liver cirrhosis. He works in Lucknow but visits a hospital in Hyderabad to check if he can undergo a liver transplant because he has only six to seven months to live. Over there, he meets Revathy (Revathy), a grief counselor. Her job also includes encouraging people to go for organ transplant.

Although Vinayak stands a chance for getting a liver transplant, the process has some major financial and emotional challenges in store, including his own deteriorating health. His elder brother Kartik (Sawan Tank), a medical student, keeps his studies aside to look after Vinayak. While undergoing treatment, he develops an unusual bond with his doctor and nurse, played by Hemant Kher and Mrinmayee Godbole respectively.

Despite the storyline, Aye Zindagi is much more than what we expected it to be at half point. It’s based on an incredible true story that took place in India some years back. This is a rare film where the makers haven’t tampered with the real tale and kept it as it is. However, there was no need for this since the real story itself is highly emotional and dramatic, which we get the know in detail once the film ends.

In a film relying on as much reality as possible, it was necessary for it to shine during its various emotional moments and that’s exactly what happens here. The narrative is filled with moments triggering different emotions and each one moves you. The best one happens when there is a major twist in the tale. This particular incident keeps haunting you long after the film is over.

It is vital for such films to be high on performances in order for the audience to feel for the characters. Aye Zindagi doesn’t disappoint on this front too. Satyajeet Dubey provides a dedicated act where we constantly feel for him as he goes through a whirlpool of emotions. The scene where he breaks down with his brother and the climax deserve special mention.

As one would expect from a seasoned artiste like Revathy, she is thoroughly impressive. Hemant Kher, Mrinmayee Godbole and the rest of the actors too contribute positively.

Also read: When SRK did a Panchayat 33 years ago

Aye Zindagi comes with its share of minuses as well. The film’s length, which is 105 minutes, could have been reduced further, especially during the ending moments. The character of Revathy’s son should have been given more importance, in order to increase the impact of the basic storyline.

But the positives easily override the negatives making Aye Zindagi a surprise package of the year where Hindi cinema has been criticized a lot for its content.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5

Director: Anirban Bose

Producer: Shiladitya Bora

Writers: Anirban Bose

Cast: Satyajeet Dubey, Revathy, Hemant Kher, Mrinmayee Godbole

When Subodh Bhave was rejected for the role of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj

October 11, 2022 by Keyur Seta Leave a Comment

Subodh Bhave will be playing the role of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj in Abhijeet Shirish Deshpande’s Har Har Mahadev. This is yet another real-life character played by the actor in his long list of biopics.

During the trailer launch of the movie, Bhave revealed that he had once got a chance to play the role of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj more than two decades before but things didn’t work out.

“When I had recently shifted to Mumbai to become an actor, Vinay Apte was making a TV serial on Shiv Chhatrapati in Hindi,” he said. “I had auditioned for the role of Shiv Chhatrapati. But I wasn’t selected. I had to wait for 22 years to play that character. Maybe it was Maharaj’s will to let me get prepared to play his character.”

Subodh Bhave further revealed that even after being offered the role, he, initially, had refused the film. He said that the same thing had happened with the earlier film he did with Deshpande Ani… Dr Kashinath Ghanekar (2018)

“There is one similarity in both the films,” said the actor. “I didn’t want to play Kashinath Ghanekar’s character too but I did. Also when Abhijit wanted to shoot the film [Har Har Mahadev], I had the US tour coming up for my play. But in order for me to play this character, Corona arrived, there was lockdown and the shoot dates were postponed and I got the role.”

Also read: Play review – Ashrunchi Zali Phule starring Subodh Bhave

Produced by Zee Studios, Har Har Mahadev will be releasing during Diwali on 25 October. The film will also be released in Hindi, Tamil, Telugu and Malyalam. This is the first Marathi film to be released in five languages.

Adipurush teaser has triggered opposite political reactions

October 9, 2022 by Keyur Seta 1 Comment

Filmmaker Om Raut’s Adipurush has been one of the keenly-awaited films ever since it was announced more than a couple of years back. The filmmaker’s Hindi debut Tanhaji: The Unsung Warrior, his previous effort, had become a runaway hit at the box office, so there was anticipation on what he would offer next.

Apart from the cast of Prabhas, Saif Ali Khan and Kriti Sanon, the major reason why Adipurush made heads turn was because of its adaptation from the great Indian epic Ramayana.

But the reaction to the long-awaited teaser finally released more than a week back would have taken the team of Adipurush by a rude surprise. The initial footage has been panned on social media for more than one reason.

Firstly, the VFX has been criticized as the visuals didn’t impress the viewers. But more than that, the look of Saif Ali Khan’s character of Raavan has been literally lambasted for it doesn’t match with what people imagine the character to be.

Not just that, the looks of Prabhas and Devdatta Nage, who play Lord Ram and Hanuman, along with the depiction of the Vaanar Sena have also come under criticism.

It was gradually realized that the teaser has given rise to opposite political reactions.

Om Raut started off his career with the Marathi movie Lokmanya: Ek Yugpurush in 2015. Apart from narrating the life story of Bal Gangadhar Tilak aka Lokmanya Tilak, the film also gave special footage to the protagonist’s efforts in writing Gita Rahasya, his own interpretation of the Bhagavad Gita.

Adipurush starring Prabhas and Saif Ali Khan — Prabhas and Saif Ali Khan in Adipurush (Source: YouTube teaser screenshots)

His next Tanhaji, his debut in Hindi, was about the achievement of the Maratha warrior Tanaji Malusare.

In other words, both the films were appreciated by the Indian Right Wing. Of course, the movies weren’t aimed at them specifically but their subjects were such that they naturally found takers in people from that particular political side.

The announcement of Adipurush naturally excited the Right Wingers since the film is based on Lord Ram. Plus, Raut’s social media posts are also appreciated by them, especially the ones about the upcoming Ram Mandir in Ayodhya.

Another reason for the excitement for Adipurush for them was the casting of Prabhas as Ram. The actor has formed a fan base among the Right Wingers after the mammoth success of both the Baahubali movies. The films are considered pro-Hindu because of their content, although they were appreciated with people across political opinions.

Unfortunately for the makers, it is the Right Wingers who have been offended the most by the teaser of Adipurush. Although Prabhas is facing criticisms for his look as Ram, it is the portrayal of Saif that is receiving the maximum flak for him allegedly looking as a Mughal ruler or Alauddin Khilji. Despite being evil, Raavan was a learned scholar and, as per the reactions, Saif isn’t appearing like one in this get-up.

But that’s not all. Quite a few ‘pro-Hindu’ groups have started protesting and calling for a ban on the movie. The teaser has also triggered one such group to demand ‘Sanatani Censor Board’ to ensure that Hindu gods aren’t portrayed in a ‘derogatory’ manner in movies. A few BJP (Bharatiya Janata Party) leaders too have slammed the teaser. Right Wingers on social media have also been trending boycott against the movie.

The film’s teaser was launched at a grand event in Ayodhya, where the much talked-about Ram Temple is being constructed currently. Ironically, the chief priest of the same temple has demanded a ban on the film.

On the other hand, the liberal crowd or those against the Right Wing have been providing full support to Adipurush since they believe there should be freedom of expression for the makers to portray any character the way they want. Their main argument is that nobody knows how the characters present in the Ramayana looked in real.

Before the teaser came out, not many would have expected a pro-Hindu movie made by pro-Hindu stars to be slammed by the Right Wing and supported by those having an opposite political view. The moral of the story is that trying to please people of any political ideology can backfire.

We can just wait and watch what happens when the full trailer of Adipurush is released.

Vikram Vedha review – Does the Hindi remake of the iconic Tamil film work?

September 30, 2022 by Keyur Seta Leave a Comment

Mainstream Hindi cinema has been obsessed with remaking successful and acclaimed south Indian films since years. However, a lot of these films haven’t yielded fruitful results. One should take note that most of those ineffective remakes have been made by different set of people.

Vikram Vedha (2022) shows how much difference it can make when the same set of writers and directors, in this case Pushkar and Gayathri who wrote and directed the original Tamil film of 2017, take on the responsibility of remaking their film in another language.

The film is set in the north Indian town of Lucknow where senior cop Vikram (Saif Ali Khan) takes immense pride in being an encounter specialist, along with his team that helps him out with the same, since he believes they are only finishing off the bad guys. He has a conflict with his wife (Radhika Apte), a lawyer who doesn’t approve of fake encounters.

Vikram is loaded with the task of nabbing the dreaded criminal Vedha (Hrithik Roshan). He and his team has been struggling to match up to him. But one day, Vedha himself surrenders by walking into the police station. Vikram finds his act fishy and wonders about his motive. During the interrogation, Vedha narrates a story to Vikram that the latter can’t afford to ignore.

Despite the Hindi remake following the same storyline, it is given an identity of its own by the makers. The setting, milieu, characters, lingo and, most importantly, the more mainstream presentation makes the new Vikram Vedha worth enjoying even for those who have liked the original.

Vikram Vedha review — Saif Ali Khan and Hrithik Roshan in Vikram Vedha

Similarly, Saif Ali Khan and Hrithik Roshan bring out their own versions of the two characters played by R Madhavan and Vijay Sethupathi in the original. You are never reminded of the duo from the original and this is another major plus point for the movie.

Khan brings out his own toughness and style while enacting the ‘good’ cop. He scores high also when his character develops later on. Hrithik is remarkable as the ‘bad’ guy with different shades. His sarcasm is spot on and so is his sensibility in serious situations, although his accent does remind you of his act in Super 30 (2019) a few times.

Radhika Apte turns out to be the perfect choice for the role of an honest and upright lawyer. Sharib Hashmi has proved over the years that he can’t do anything wrong. He continues the same here in the role of Babloo Bhaiya. Rohit Saraf and Yogita Bihani score well in their supporting acts.

Like the original, the remake too is not just a stylish action saga but also thought-provoking in terms of whether all is either black or white in today’s world.

Vikram Vedha perfectly looks like it belongs to the small north Indian towns because of some impressive work by the production designer. The film scores high even in terms of other technical aspects like cinematography, editing and background score. The last sees the repetition of the signature tune from the original film. It is hard to imagine Vikram Vedha without that powerful and kick-worthy background score.

Also read: When SRK did a Panchayat 33 years ago

While the film is a worthy remake of the original, it has some minuses. For some time in the second half the narrative isn’t as smooth as one would expect, especially after watching the original. The all-important surrender scene doesn’t match up to the one in the original in terms of intensity and tension. It also appears more hurried.

But all in all, Vikram Vedha is one of the rare impressive Hindi films in a year that has largely been lackluster.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5

Directors: Pushkar and Gayathri

Writers: Pushkar, Gayathri and Benazir Ali Fida

Producers: Reliance Entertainment, T-Series, YNOT Studios, Friday Filmworks and Jio Studios

Cast: Hrithik Roshan, Saif Ali Khan, Radhika Apte, Sharib Hashmi, Satyadeep Mishra, Rohit Saraf, Yogita Bihani

Runtime: 159 minutes

Dear Sony LIV, Dean was run-out, NOT ‘Mankaded’

September 25, 2022 by Keyur Seta Leave a Comment

The third ODI between India and England at the historic Lords stadium turned out to be an exciting and nail-biting affair. By winning the match by 16 runs, India wrapped up the series 3-0.

It was also an emotional match as it was also the farewell for India’s great pace bowler Jhulan Goswami. She provided a fine performance in her last match by picking up 2 for 30 off her 10 overs with 3 maidens.

But unfortunately, instead of the close encounter and Goswami’s retirement, the cricketing world has been discussing and debating the last wicket of the match in which Charlie Dean was run out at the bowler’s end by Deepti Sharma for backing up too far.

This has been a legitimate mode of dismissal but it was considered unsporting earlier because of its nature. It was referred to as ‘Mankading’ as India’s Vinoo Mankad effected two such run-outs in two different games during India’s 1947-48 tour to Australia.

Deepti Sharma Mankading run out — Screenshot from Sony LIV’s broadcast

Ravichandran Ashwin got embroiled in a controversy when he run-out Jos Buttler in the same way during the 2020 season of the IPL (Indian Premiere League). Similarly, Deepti Sharma has become the talk of the town for the same reason.

However, the rules were recently updated wherein it was decided that such run-outs won’t be considered against the spirit of the game. More importantly, the new rules also stated that such dismissals should be counted as run-outs instead of referring to them as ‘Mankading.’

But despite such official declarations, commentators Nasser Hussain and Lydia Greenway started the unfair game rhetoric when the final wicket fell. Greenway reacted as if something illegal was done. While Hussain kept saying that this is within the rules of the game, he messed it up by referring to the dismissal as ‘controversial’ later on.

If it is well within the rules and also not against the spirit of the game, as per the latest update, how is it controversial, Mr Hussain?

Also read: When Geoffrey Boycott had to chew his hat because of Ajay Ratra

But what really took the cake (not in a good way) was Sony Sports’s streaming platform Sony LIV highlighting that the batter was ‘Mankaded’ while showing that video. [See the image above].

How is the platform unaware about the latest guidelines stating that such run-outs are nothing but run-outs? Do the people responsible for the text on the platform are so naïve about the important developments in the game?

Harsha Bhogle discussing why such dismissals shouldn’t be referred to as ‘Mankading’ after the Ashwin incident in 2020

When SRK did a Panchayat 33 years ago

August 28, 2022 by Keyur Seta 10 Comments

Shah Rukh Khan is not only one of the biggest stars in India but also world over. But the actor has had to work his way up through hard-work from scratch. After doing theatre in Delhi, he migrated to Mumbai to continue the profession.

During his initial days, he was seen in quite a few Doordarshan shows like Dil Dariya (1988), Fauji (1988), Intezaar (1989), Adhuri Zindagi (1989), etc.

One notable work Shah Rukh Khan did during those days for the same channel was in the show Ummeed in 1989. The serial featured different stories that used to run for two episodes. In one such segment, Khan featured in the role of a young bank employee.

A noble soul with the channel name of ‘Super Tuber’ uploaded the two episodes of the show on YouTube three years ago.

As soon as I started watching the first episode, I was instantly reminded of TVF’s Amazon Prime Video show Panchayat. The web-series saw Jitendra Kumar play Abhishek Tripathi, an engineering graduate forced to take up the position of a secretary at the panchayat office in the small village Phulera, Uttar Pradesh.

Shah Rukh Khan in Ummeed and Jitendra Kumar in Panchayat

The city-bred Abhishek gets a culture shock by the life in the village. But there were ruder surprises in store for him when he takes a look at the panchayat office. It turns out to be a basic office which, must to his dismay, also doubled up as his residence. Abhishek also finds it difficult to adjust to the workings of the village due to the politics and age-old attitudes.

Coming back to Ummeed, Shah Rukh Khan plays the character of Anand Gupta who is ‘promoted’ as the branch manager to the bank’s newly-opened branch at Bhingri. In reality, Anand’s superior was under tremendous pressure from his senior to send someone at the said branch since nobody was willing to relocate to the place.

Anand’s happiness turns sour as soon as he lands at the bank’s branch in Bhingri. The place is located in a no-man’s land and is completely empty; no staff and just one helper. In fact, the helper and Anand are the only members of the staff.

This is similar to Abhishek’s situation in Panchayat. And just like that web-series, Anand’s personal room is also inside the office, just a few steps away, and this one too has a set-up for making tea near the window.

That’s not all though. Just like in Panchayat, Shah Rukh Khan’s character in Ummeed too forms a bond with the people of the village after, initially, going through a nightmare.

This is in no way stating that Panchayat was lifted from Ummeed. A city-based officer facing challenges after being transferred to a rural area is a common theme around the world.

Ummeed featured a very innocent and raw version of Shah Rukh Khan. He perfectly fitted the role of a common man from a middle-class family required to work hard to rise in his career. In other words, he made a clear announcement of his acting talent very early in his career; something we got to know in the following years.

Also read: Exploring Gehraiyaan’s selfish character in James Hadley Chase manner

Ummeed was written by Mukesh Sharma. I couldn’t find any other work by him after doing a Google search. Vikas Desai, as per IMDB.com, before directing this show, had acted in quite a few parallel films like Arvind Desai Ki Ajeeb Dastaan (1978), Giddh: The Vulture (1984), Andhi Gali (1984) and Anantyatra (1985). There is no record of what he did after that, except that he acted in Ketan Mehta’s Aar Ya Paar (1997).

Rajat Kapoor is named as one of the assistant directors on the show. It is not known whether he is the same one of Bheja Fry (2007) fame.

Ummeed was produced by Joint Publicity Committee, Public Sector Banks. It is interesting to see a show produced by the banking sector showing the sorry state of banks in rural areas.

Watch both the episodes of Ummeed below:

Why actual ‘anti-national’ statements never face BOYCOTT?

August 13, 2022 by Keyur Seta 1 Comment

India is all set to celebrate 75 years of its freedom from the British, which they got in 1947. However, it is ironical that just when the country is reaching the important milestone related to its freedom, a section of the population is busy promoting curtailment of the same.

The whole #BoycottLaalSinghChaddha ‘movement’ is not just unfair but plainly silly. One of the main reasons why the film is being boycotted is the supposed ‘anti-India’ statements made by the film’s lead actor and producer Aamir Khan way back in 2015.

Messages are being circulated claiming that the star said that he wants to leave India as he is feeling unsafe. This is nothing but a fabricated version of what Khan actually said.

As you can hear from the above video, Khan said that his then wife Kiran Rao asked if they should move out of India. Firstly, it wasn’t suggested by Khan. Secondly, the very next thing the actor said was, “Now that’s a disastrous and a very big statement for Kiran to make to me.” Khan himself said on record that what she said was “disastrous” but not many of us paid heed to that, either knowingly or unknowingly.

Funnily enough, the statement came out in 2015. Following this, Khan released three of his films in the following years, Dangal (2016), Secret Superstar (2017) and Thugs Of Hindostan (2018). Except Dangal to some extent, no other film faced boycott. But today, seven years after that statement, there is a massive campaign against the actor for his film Laal Singh Chaddha.

Source: YouTube screenshot from Koffee With Karan promo

This isn’t the only reason why the film is boycotted. Somehow few months before the release of the film, fake messages and memes are being circulated claiming that Aamir said in his show Satyamev Jayate that we shouldn’t pour milk on the Shivling and should instead use that money to help the needy. Some messages are also claiming that he said the same thing in his earlier film PK (2014).

As it is proved in one of my previous articles, Aamir has never made any such statement on the Shivling, either in his show or in the movie. Instead, it was Akshay Kumar and Paresh Rawal who have made exactly the same statements (read the article and see the videos HERE). The former made it in the movie OMG Oh My God (2012) and the latter while promoting the same film. In fact, Akshay also went onto criticize the practice of pouring oil on Hanuman’s deity on Saturdays.

Hear both of them out in the videos above. Did anyone of you ever come across any boycott calls for Akshay or Rawal?

Even if the boycotters argue that out of these, the statement made by Aamir in 2015 about Rao asking if they should leave India are problematic, it is still hypocritical. This is because they are completely ignoring Kangana Ranaut comment made last year, which is many times more controversial and offensive than what Khan said.

Speaking at a summit organized by a news channel, she described India’s independence from the British in 1947 saying, “Woh azadi nahin thi, woh bheek thi. Aur jo azadi mili hai woh 2014 mein mili hai.” Watch the video of the same below.

Now, I don’t need to spell out how problematic this statement is. In a single sentence, the actress has questioned the sacrifices of all those freedom fighters who fought for India’s freedom. It is also clear that the comments made by Aamir are nowhere near to what she said. Plus, she has had a history of making comments of this nature. Comparing Mumbai with PoK is just one other example.

So, if you are deeply offended and incensed by Aamir’s comments but have no problems with what Ranaut’s said, you know what that makes you. More so if you are celebrating India’s 75years of freedom without having issues when someone said that that wasn’t actual freedom.

When team Mumbai almost AGAIN defeated Australia

July 31, 2022 by Keyur Seta 1 Comment

One of the fondest memories for Mumbai cricket fans who started watching the game in the 90s would be their team’s victory against the mighty Australians in 1998 at the Brabourne Stadium. That three-day match saw Sachin Tendulkar score his first ever first-class double century.

It was also the first time I set foot inside a cricket stadium in my life and I couldn’t have asked for anything better. But even after Tendulkar and his team’s terrific display of batting, none of us thought that Mumbai’s Ranji team would go on to defeat Australia in two-and-a-half days. Read more about that match HERE.

It was a practice match before the three-match test series Australia was to play against India. Similarly, in 2001, Australia was set to play against Mumbai again before the test series. The 2001 test series turned out to be one of the best ever, especially due to the historic second test at the Eden Gardens, Kolkata.

But before the test series commenced, the match between Mumbai and Australia, again at the Brabourne Stadium, brought back terrific memories of the 1998 match between the same teams.

Tendulkar wasn’t playing this one as he was rested. But before the start of the match, a news article quoted the Master Blaster motivating team Mumbai by saying, “Don’t forget what we did in 1998.” [I can’t find that article now]

Sameer Dighe and Steve Waugh [File photos]

Mumbai batted first and soon started struggling at 82 for 5 with Amol Muzumdar and Vinod Kambli out for 1 and 0 respectively. But captain and wicket-keeper Sameer Dighe’s counterattack (84) with Sairaj Bahutule (51) and later with Romesh Powar (65*) took Mumbai to a good score of 328 for 9 at which they declared the innings.

When Australia turned out to bat, skipper Steve Waugh scored an unbeaten 106. However, nobody else from their line-up got going and the team was all out for just 203. The Aussies couldn’t get the services of Mark Waugh as he was injured soon after the match commenced.

Mumbai’s top order showed more maturity in the second innings as both the openers Vinayak Mane and Wasim Jaffer scored half centuries. They declared the innings at 191 for 8. Out of all the Mumbai wickets, Shane Warne picked up 7. Australia were given a target of 317 after the first session of the third day.

It looked like the match will end in a draw but there was drama in store in the last session. Australia’s top order collapsed and they were reduced to 64 for 5 at one stage and 80 for 6 soon after. Bahutule rocked the Australian top-order by scalping 4 wickets. He was getting the ball to talk.

I remember watching the last day of the match at my cousin’s place and we were super excited as we anticipated the repeat of 1998. Plus, Australia had only 9 wickets to play since Mark Waugh was injured.

But his twin and the Aussie skipper saw the day through (34*) with some gutsy support from Damien Fleming who battled 72 balls for his unbeaten 22.

Although Mumbai couldn’t win again and repeat 1998, they gave a scare to the best test side of the world. Tendulkar’s motivation before the match had a positive impact on the team.

Interestingly, Australia had fielded a much stronger side in the 2001 match against Mumbai in comparison to the one they did in 1998. And most importantly, there was no Tendulkar in the 2001 encounter. It goes onto show Mumbai’s talent backed by some terrific fighting spirit back then. Today, not even a picture (forget video) of that match is available. There’s only the scorecard available HERE.

Mumbai’s skipper and wicket-keeper Sameer Dighe, who top-scored in the first innings, was selected in the Indian team for the third test match at Chennai in the following series. His 22 not out in the fourth innings of the match became instrumental in India winning the test and subsequently the series by 2-1.

Also read: Forgotten innings – Nayan Mongia’s historic feat vs Australia

South Korea through the eyes of a vegetarian Indian

July 17, 2022 by Keyur Seta 7 Comments

I got my passport created in 2016 at my dad and brother’s insistence. Even after I finally got hold of it after numerous formalities, I was never desperate to go abroad. It’s not that I wasn’t interested. I was just patient and felt that if it has to happen, it will. It finally happened six years later in this month when I got a chance to visit South Korea.

Since last year, I had formed an association with the people running the Bucheon International Fantastic Film Festival (aka BIFAN) over there after they approached me to be a guest contributor for their festival magazine named Made in Asia. Last year, the festival was held online because of the deadly second COVID-19 wave. But this year, they held it in a hybrid mode and invited me to visit Bucheon and subsequently the festival.

The road to my first visit abroad wasn’t an easy one. Apart from lots of preparations, the most challenging aspect was the visa process which required plenty of documents. Plus, there were a few complications in my submission. I started visualizing the trip only after my visa got approved.

The route of the Air India flight was from Mumbai to Delhi to Incheon (South Korea). I am not a very flight-friendly traveller, so traveling for about nine hours from Mumbai to Incheon looked like a challenge. It didn’t turn out to be though because of the in-flight entertainment option where I saw Sarkar (2005) and Nightcrawler (2014), along with reading an e-book.

When the plane finally landed at the Incheon Airport, it took me some time to believe that I would be actually setting foot outside India for the first time. The first thing I noticed after coming out of the airport, after quite a few formalities, was the traffic sense of the people, but I didn’t think much about it.

The route from the airport to Hotel Floce in Bucheon was a long one and it gave me a good opportunity to keenly observe the surroundings. When we reached the hotel, I was surprised to know that the manager didn’t understand English but, again, I didn’t think much about it. After taking a long rest as I was awake almost the whole night in the flight, I went out to take a stroll and to know places where I can eat some delicious food.

I soon realized that the people over there take traffic signals very seriously. They would cross the road only when the pedestrian signal turns green, even if the road is empty from both the sides.

Here’s how the citizens over there follow traffic rules

When I started looking out for good food joints, I was made aware of two rude surprises. I initially felt that the hotel manager not understanding English would be a one-off instance. But after enquiring at the various food joints I realized that almost everyone over there couldn’t understand English.

But the second surprise was even deadlier when it slowly dawned upon me that none of the joints served vegetarian food! I am someone who doesn’t even eat eggs, so I felt worried. On the first day of my first trip outside India, I really felt lost!

I was then reminded of the store 7 Eleven suggested by my brother. Fortunately, there was one right opposite the hotel. I realized that they too have no options in vegetarian food. I heaved a sigh of relief when I found different types of sweet breads (some with cream and jam). They had eggs in it but I didn’t care. Thankfully, I had carried a lot of dry food from home prepared by my mom.

It was then time to head out for the opening ceremony of the Bucheon International Fantastic Film Festival (BIFAN). I was highly impressed with their punctuality. The event started dot on time and it was to-the-point. Very unlike the filmi events in Mumbai which start even a couple of hours (sometimes even more) after the scheduled time. The same punctuality was seen in the rest of the events and screenings too.

The dinner at the event had no veg options, except salads, fruits and desserts, which didn’t surprise me now. Although I was happy to be here, I was also worried about how I would spend the next few days.

Next morning, I was expecting the hotel to have some vegetarian items. They had but, again, it was just bread. The only option to go with it was an egg omelette. I had had eggs when I was too small. Our doctor had urged my family to feed me few regularly as I was weak. I felt now is the time to go back to my childhood as there was no other option left.

The lady preparing and serving breakfast at the hotel was too kind and caring but she also didn’t understand English. So I translated the words ‘bread’ and ‘eggs’ via Google for her. She nicely served toasts, omelette, salad and coffee. The menu for my breakfast was the same every morning. This country made a vegetarian into a temporary eggitarian.

It was a very important day as I had to speak representing India at a panel discussion at the festival. Just before the event, I attended a luncheon by the Film Development Council of the Philippines where I got some cosy vibes. And just before my panel talk, I had a preparation session with the moderator and fellow panelists from other countries (South Korea, Philippines and Thailand).

The panel discussion at the festival

I had never participated in a panel talk before even in India. But whatever butterflies I had in my stomach vanished after the preparation session. The main event went off well and much to my pleasant surprise, I was able to speak without being nervous. There was a scary moment though when a lady from India disagreed me and it looked as if she would rip apart my views but she just handed over the microphone back after a long speech. Phew!

I later realized that my state of mind completely changed after this event and, especially, after interacting with others. I finally started feeling at home in South Korea!

Things became better the next day when my brother came to know that there is an Indian restaurant named Machha Puchhre not far from the hotel and it has vegetarian options. Surprisingly, when I had asked a lot of locals about any veg food joint in the locality, nobody told me about this one.

Machha Puchhre is run by a lady and the place also served veg Indian dishes like Samosas, Paneer curries, Dal and Naan. I was impressed with the quality of food and it was a relief to get to eat Indian food over there. It wasn’t possible to eat here daily twice because of the prices. But I was happy to know that I have this option.

I could only get US dollars at a currency exchange centre in Mumbai because they didn’t keep Korean won as not many Indians travel there. So I had to hunt for a place to exchange dollars into won the next day. Finding such a place was a major challenge, especially due to the language barrier. I had by then become used to translating words from English to Korean on Google to get directions from the local people.

I couldn’t find taxis and I wasn’t keen to go through the subway as I felt I might get confused. But deciding to walk to the destination offered me a chance to explore Bucheon and I was mighty impressed with how the city is maintained. The habit of walking in this city was kept alive throughout the trip. In fact, the distance I walked in these 5-6 days might be almost the same that I generally do in about a few months in Mumbai.

The area near Hotel Koryo, which lies on the right

I became fond of the area near Hotel Koryo at Gyeonggi-do (the name of the road) where all the events and interactions of BIFAN took place. The foot-over bridge over there (with slopes instead of steps) that connected one end of the road to the other became my favourite place.

As I had travelled all the way to South Korea, it made sense that I should visit Seoul. I had a long subway ride where I struggled to get tickets from automatic ticket machines and in getting into the right train. The language barrier added to the challenge. Finally, I reached the destination. But it was raining cats and dogs and what not. I got almost fully drenched but managed to visit the famous palace and explore the city somehow.

But it was a long journey back and I had to desperately wait to reach Bucheon. When I finally got down at a station in Bucheon, I felt as if I was back home. From being lost to feeling at home, it all happened in a span of just five days!

Apart from the impressive city of Bucheon, it was all possible because of the kind-hearted and super-helpful citizens of South Korea. They couldn’t understand my language and I couldn’t understand theirs. But they would go out of their way to help me find an address or a location. I guess kindness is understood in all languages.

Also see – Photos: Shikara rides and houseboats in Srinagar, Kashmir

I have heard quite a few times that great trips are the ones that change you in some way. On a lighter note, when I returned home after a long flight, my mother instantly noticed that my tummy had gone a bit inside. Now that was a welcome change!