Monthly Archives: June 2019

6 noteworthy moments from Article 15

Director Anubhav Sinha’s Article 15 is largely about the atrocities faced by people belonging to the backward castes. But the Ayushmann Khurrana starrer also has a lot of layers and the film ends up saying a lot without actually saying much. The end result is disturbing but at the same time positive as well.

It will be worth revisiting 6 noteworthy aspects from Article 15:

Urban-rural divide
A city bred person might get a jolt when he or she witnesses the way of living and norms of a rural area. The same happens when the protagonist Ayan Ranjan [Khurrana] is posted in a remote village in Uttar Pradesh. He is shocked to see such strict practice of caste even in 2019, including the practice of not even letting the shadow of the ‘untouchables’ touch you. Article 15 doesn’t shy away from showcasing such stark reality of ‘modern’ India.

Still proud to be an Indian
Ayan Ranjan’s situation is very much like many of us. He is disturbed and disgusted to see the reality of India and is ready to expose it in front of everyone. However, he is still proud to be an Indian, like he tells her wife on phone.

Article 15 poster

It reminded me of the scene in Ashutosh Gowariker’s Swades where Shah Rukh Khan’s character says, “Main nahin maanta humara desh duniya ka sabse mahaan desh hai.” But deep down, he cares for the nation and agrees to leave US for it.

Ignorance is bliss?  
There is a scene where Khurrana is wondering as to how people around him can behave normal and quite happy despite the gruesome crime that has taken place in the village. This is reflective of how a section of the population is turning a blind eye on various issues under the garb of nationalism these days.

Horning out castesim  
Khurrana asks the caste of a vendor but her answer is overturned by the loud horn of a passing truck. This is an impressively creative way of giving a message that anybody’s caste isn’t important.

Ambedkar’s presence
The teachings of Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar has been hardly explored by mainstream Hindi cinema over the decades. We have had biopics on various leaders but none on him. This is a surprise since Ambedkar has had a lion’s share in the making of the Constitution Of India, the very book on which the idea of India is based. Article 15 fills the much needed void.

Heroic entry
The high point of the film for me is the entry of Article 15. The arrival of the document produces the same effect that a mass hero does when he makes a heroic entry. The words under Article 15 and the playing of ‘Vande Mataram’ in the background will always be unforgettable.

Additional reading:

Short Story: Caste Away

By: Keyur Seta

When hearing issues stopped India from winning against England

India is all set to play England in one of its most important matches of the ongoing 2019 cricket World Cup tomorrow. India would be hoping to keep its unbeaten record intact. For England, it’s a must-win match. They are in the fourth position but one winner out of the Pakistan and Afghanistan match today will move ahead of them if they lose today.

The last time India and England clashed in a World Cup match was in the league stage in 2011 at Bangalore. After winning the toss and electing to bat, India scored a big score of 338 all out in their 50 overs. They were largely helped by Sachin Tendulkar who scored 120 off 115 balls, including 5 sixes.

India did look good to reach 350 but they kept on losing wickets in the powerplay and got all out, much against the run of play. Losing wickets in the powerplay was a common norm for a lot of teams in the 2011 World Cup. But 338 was still a very good total.

But the runs didn’t turn out to be enough as the match went onto become a tie. England’s opener Andrew Strauss was adjudged the man of the match for his fighting 158 off 145 balls. At one stage, England was cruising to victory only to encounter an India-like collapse in the end which ensured they didn’t go home with a victory.

However, not taking anything away from England’s response, this is a match that India should have clearly won. I am not saying this by stating if India would have bowled well. The reason for putting it this way is because the Indian players’ hearing issues in the match.

India v/s England during the 2011 World Cup

When Strauss was batting on just 13, he tried square cutting Zaheer Khan, got a nick and was caught by the keeper Mahendra Singh Dhoni. However, nobody appealed! The players couldn’t hear the nick but the commentators and the viewers clearly heard it from the stump microphone. I remember hearing it repeatedly whenever the replay was played.

But that’s not all. The same batsman nicked the same bowler and was again caught by Dhoni when he was on 111. And for some strange reason, none of the Indian players heard the edge and they didn’t appeal!

The commentators were of the view that there was a lot of noise in the Chinnaswamy Stadium and this would have been the reason why the Indian players didn’t hear the edges. They may be right as the noise was high. But it beats me even eight years later because it happened twice and Indians are used to playing amidst noise created by fans.

There is no denying that the Indian players messed up by losing their last seven wickets for just 33 runs and then their bowlers gave away too many bad balls. But if England’s top scorer would have got out so early in a match that was tied, India would have been the clear winners that day.

This would have also impacted the points table after the end of league matches. England had 7 points while West Indies and Bangladesh were tied with 6 points each. WI went to the quarterfinal round because of better net run rate.

Also read: He was selected for 1983 WC, but had to wait till ‘99 to play for India

But if England had lost the match, they would have been tied with West Indies and Bangladesh with 6 points. Obviously, England would have still qualified because of better net run rate but it would have created an interesting situation.

We have seen bad umpiring decisions being remembered and debated for years. But something as unusual as this has hardly been discussed in these years. So much so that there is no video of the aforementioned incidents and just one article on the internet.

By: Keyur Seta

Additional Reading:

Finally, a chance to revisit Kapil Dev’s 175, which hardly anybody has seen

How Pakistan was saved by rains from a difficult situation in 1992 World Cup

Imran Khan 1992 World Cup

How rain helped Pakistan in 1992 World Cup

Winning the 1992 World Cup has been the biggest achievement for the Pakistan cricket team till date. The second best might be their triumph in the 2017 ICC Champions Trophy where they defeated India convincingly in the final.

Pakistan sprung a surprise by winning the cup in ’92 as not many would have fancied their chances during the league stage. But their performances in the semi-final against New Zealand [what a chase it was!] and final against England [Wasim Akram’s mystery ball to get Chris Lewis out] showed that they were the deserving winners of the cup.

Interestingly, while going through the points table and the scores of the league matches in the series, something alarming caught my eye. The points table showed Pakistan with 9 points on the fourth position while Australia and West Indies tied on the fifth position with 8 points each.

Now, let us go back to the match between Pakistan and England in the league stage played on March 1 at Adelaide. Pakistan were sent in to bat by England and they were all out for a mere 74 runs! At one stage they were reduced to 47 for 8.

Pakistan 1992 World Cup

England looked like winning the match as after eight overs there were 24 for 1, needing only 51 more with plenty of overs left. Unfortunately for England, rains started pouring in and as per the weird rain rule in the series, they needed 62 off 10 overs to win the match.

Reacting on this, England’s Gladstone Small, who played that match, told The Guardian, “It was ridiculous. It should have been that we needed to get 14 or something like that.” But the rain kept interrupting and ultimately the match was abandoned. Both the teams got one point each from the match.

Small also admitted that the same rain rule helped them in the infamous semi-final where South Africa were reduced to getting 21 to off just 1 ball.

Going back to the points table of the ’92 WC, if rains wouldn’t have interrupted the match, England was on course to winning this one. If this would have happened, Pakistan, Australia and West Indies would have been tied on the fourth position with 8 points each.

1992 World Cup points table Pakistan
Source: ESPN Cricinfo

As seen in the points table above, the Net Run Rate [NRR] of Pakistan, Australia and West Indies was 0.166, 0.201 and 0.076 respectively. If Pakistan had lost the match, their NRR could have been affected.

Also read: He was selected for 1983 WC, but had to wait till ‘99 to play for India

It would have been interesting to see the extent to which Pakistan’s NRR would have been reduced and whether it would have impacted their chances of qualifying for the semi-finals.

By: Keyur Seta

With valuable inputs from Tamojit Ghosh

Why it doesn’t make sense to blame ICC for the World Cup schedule?

The ongoing ICC Cricket World Cup 2019 has turned out to be disappointment because of few matches getting abandoned regularly due to non-stop rains in few venues. Indian fans are disappointed the most after their match against New Zealand at Trent Bridge was washed out completely.

What’s worse is that things are not looking good for the big India v/s Pakistan World Cup match tomorrow (16 June 2019) at Old Trafford, Manchester. It is raining there right now and the forecast is showing a good chance of rain over there tomorrow as well.

In today’s times, it is possible to know the weather forecast months in advance. So, the least the ICC [International Cricket Council] could have done is kept one reserve day for each match so that there is at least some chance of saving a game.

Another unpleasant surprise has been the facilities to dry a ground in a developed country like England. As is visible in all rain-affected matches, the stadiums don’t have enough covers to cover the whole ground. For example, the India v/s New Zealand match was called off only because of the wet outfield. If they can cover the entire huge area of the Eden Gardens in Kolkata, why not in England?

2019 World Cup Trophy

This might be challenging but they could have also shifted the matches from venues where heavy rainfall was expected. Changing venues few weeks before shouldn’t be impossible.

Cricket fans on social media have been constantly criticizing the ICC for the same reasons. Their frustration is justified.

However, what I find weird is few accusations levelled against the ICC, which lack common sense. People are criticizing them for organizing this tournament in the ‘rainy season’ and, more astonishingly, during the monsoon!

Also read: Finally, a chance to revisit Kapil Dev’s 175, which hardly anybody has seen

Funnily, there is no rainy season or monsoon in England like it is in India. It can rain during any time of the year. More importantly, it is summer in England right now, which is the cricket season. It is from May to September that all cricket tournaments, domestic and international, are been held since time immemorial.

Shockingly, this is coming even from people who have been watching matches in England [from their homes] since years.

By: Keyur Seta

Yuvraj Singh’s 3 heroic TEST innings that have been forgotten: See videos

Cricket fans across India are saddened by the news of India’s cricketer Yuvraj Singh announcing his retirement from all formats of the game. The thought brings back a number of achievements by the stylish left-hander for team India over the years.

It all started on his debut itself when he scored an incredible 84 runs against Australia in the 2001 Champions Trophy. This was just the beginning as Yuvraj went onto help India win a number of matches.

Some of his other achievements include his famous six sixes in Stuart Broad’s over against England in the T20 World Cup in 2007. His attack on the Australian bowlers in the semi-finals of the same series when he smashed 70 off just 30 balls is also one of his most memorable innings. Also none can forget his match winning innings in the historic 2002 Natwest Series final.

Yuvraj Singh

Yuvraj’s biggest achievement came in the 2011 World Cup in which he was adjudged the Man of the Series not just for his batting but also his bowling. It was one of the best all-around performances in World Cup history.

While he achieved a lot in the limited overs formats, it would be unfair to forget few of his innings in test matches. Of course, Yuvraj’s test career didn’t last long but it includes three important knocks. One might feel that just three innings don’t count much but they are nothing short of heroic. Hence, it will be interesting to look back at them.

112 v/s Pakistan in the 2nd test – 2004


Yuvraj came into bat when India were in trouble at 94 for 4. The left hander steadied the ship and helped his team reach a respectable 287 runs. His 112 came only in 129 balls with 15 fours and 2 sixes. Without him, India would have struggled to post even a decent total as none of the star players like Sachin Tendulkar, Saurav Ganguly, Rahul Dravid, Virendra Sehwag and VVS Laxman reached even 40.

169 v/s Pakistan in the 3rd test – 2007

Yuvraj once again rescued India after they were reduced to 61 for 4 in the first innings while batting first. He smashed the Pakistani bowlers all around the park in his glorious innings of 169, which is also his highest test score. Perhaps his display got overshadowed by Saurav Ganguly’s brilliant 239 at the other end. The two put on a humongous partnership of exactly 300 runs.

Unfortunately, there is no video available of that knock except the one of Ganguly’s innings. I do remember a powerful pull shot Yuvraj played in the bowling of Mohammad Sami.

85* v/s England in the 1st test – 2008


India achieved a mammoth feat of chasing down as many as 387 in the fourth innings of the test, which doesn’t happen often. Sachin Tendulkar was the hero who scored an unbeaten 103. But strangely, Yuvraj’s contribution in the victory has been forgotten. He played a crucial innings at the other end and made a match-winning 85 unbeaten. His innings was quick yet risk free.

I personally feel Yuvraj had it in him to be a good option in test cricket as well and he should have been given more chances.

By: Keyur Seta

Top post on IndiBlogger, the biggest community of Indian Bloggers

Play Review: Ashrunchi Zali Phule

Ashrunchi Zali Phule is an iconic Marathi play written by the late Vasant Kanetkar in 1966. It was performed for the first time by Chittaranjan Kolhatkar, Prabhakar Panshikar and, Marathi theatre’s first superstar, Kashinath Ghanekar.

The play has been staged by various teams of actors over the decades. Currently, it is been performed by Shailesh Datar, Seema Deshmukh, Umesh Jagtap and Subodh Bhave, who plays the character of Lalya originally essayed by Ghanekar. Bhave had performed Lalya in few scenes in Ghanekar’s biopic Ani… Dr Kashinath Ghanekar last year.

Produced by Colours Marathi, Anamika Kanha’s Magic and Saisakshi, the play is directed by Pratima Kulkarni.

Ashrunchi Zali Phule is the story of an honest and upright college principal Vidyanand [Datar]. He comes across Lalya [Bhave], a ruffian student from his college. After initial conflict, Vidyanand manages to reform Lalya. The young man then goes on a journey to fulfil his dream of becoming a police officer.

Meanwhile, Vidyanand’s relation with his wicked college trustee Dharmappa worsens. He gets framed in a financial crime he didn’t commit and is forced to undergo jail sentence. After he returns from prison, he decides to take revenge from Dharmappa but in the process becomes a gangster himself.

I have neither seen any of the previous versions of the play nor read the original. This review only focuses on this particular performance.

Ashrunchi Zali Phule

For the uninitiated, Ashrunchi Zali Phule initially might appear like a story of how a spoilt youngster gets reformed. But the story goes much further and gets on an interesting mode on what happens after the tables are turned for Vidyanand and Lalya. The high octane confrontational scene between both of them in the end is the high point of the play.

The makers have fairly succeeded in recreating the bygone era. The play boasts of some convincing set designing. To use some simple lighting to give the feeling of an airport in one scene was remarkable.

Ashrunchi Zali Phule has its share of minuses as well. The transformation of Vidyanand isn’t well established. It happens all of a sudden, which makes it difficult to believe. There are two of three sequences featuring Vidyanand which are dragged on even after their purpose is fulfilled. [Maybe this was fine for the era in which it was initially staged]

A major plus point here is, obviously, Subodh Bhave’s act as Lalya. Initially, it is difficult to accept him as a college student but his performance makes up for it to a good extent. His transformation as a cop and his act in the last scene makes you somewhat forget the aforementioned minuses.

Shailesh Datar also goes about his transformation successfully. The play is also well supported by Umesh Jagtap, Seema Deshmukh and others.

Overall, it is a treat to experience the applause and whistles for people of today’s era. It gives some idea of the olden days of Marathi theatre.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5

By: Keyur Seta